Delayed or abrupt? UCLA Health Research says a unique pattern of communication allows the brains of highly creative people to travel less to their destination.

According to the news – A new study led by UCLA health scientists shows that the brains of highly creative people work differently than others, with an unusual behavior observed in “centers” observed in non-creative brains. Getting caught up in quickly builds long distance relationships.

The exceptionally creative visual artists and scientists – known as the “big C” creative genres – voluntarily undergo MRI brain imaging, giving researchers in psychiatry, behavioral sciences and psychology an idea that the brain How areas connect and interact when asked to perform a task. Put creative thinking to the test.

“Our results show that the most creative people have a special connection to the brain that is willing to stay out of the beating,” said Ariana Anderson, a professor at the Simula Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA. Leading author of new articles. Journal of Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and Arts. While non-innovators follow similar paths throughout the brain, highly creative people have built their own roads.

Although the concept of creativity has been studied for decades, little is known about its biological basis, and even little is known about the brain mechanisms of extraordinary creative people, said senior author Robert Bilder. Director of the Taintenbaum Center for. Northern Institute. This uniquely designed study included highly creative people representing two different domains of creativity – the visual arts and sciences – and used a comparison group with IQ to identify creativity markers, not just intelligence. Researchers have analyzed how connections between brain regions have developed globally and locally.

“Extraordinary creativity has been associated with more random communication globally – a pattern that is less ‘effective’ but appears to be useful in the interaction of distant brain nodes with each other,” Builder said. “Patterns vary across many local brain regions, depending on whether people perform tasks. Surprisingly, the creators of the Big C had a more efficient local process in comfort, but less effective local communication when performing tasks. Doing so requires ‘thinking outside the box’.

Using aerial route maps for comparison, the researchers said that the brain activity of the creators of the Big C was similar to that of leaving flights to connecting centers to travel to a smaller city.

“In terms of mental communication, while everyone is stuck in a three-hour delay at a major airport, high-powered private jets are sent straight to the far destination,” Anderson said. “These more random connections may be less effective at times, but the structure allows brain function to ‘take the less traveled road’ and make new connections.”

Bilder, who has more than 30 years of experience in brain and behavioral communication, said: According to some of our previous findings, they may not need to work as hard as other intelligent people to do some creative work.

Unusual creative artists and scientists in the study have been nominated by a panel of experts before being approved as exceptions based on objective metrics. The “smart” comparison team was recruited from participants in a previous UCLA study who had agreed to contact for potential participation in future studies, and for those in the community who have a graduate degree. From ads. The researchers tried to make sure that age, sex, race and ethnicity were comparable to the participants in the larger C groups.

In addition to Bilder and Anderson, the authors include Kevin Japardi, an intelligence analyst at Cedar-Cena Medical Center; Kendra Knudsen, Psychological Researcher at UCLA; Susan Bockheimer, Researcher in Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences and Psychology at UCLA; And Dara Gharmani, a researcher in psychology and behavioral sciences at UCLA.

The research was donated to the Robert Builder by the John Templeton Foundation (42052), and funded by the Michael E. Tannenbaum Family Center for Creative Biology. The authors would like to thank the Staglin IMHRO Center for Cognitive Neuroscience for their support and assistance. Ariana Anderson has a career award in the scientific interface from the Borough Welcome Fund.

The authors do not report additional disclosures or potential conflicts of interest.

Leave a Comment