The term is everywhere in the discussion at the LGBT school

Proponents of restrictions on how public schools in the U.S. treat sexual orientation and gender identity say their ultimate goal is to allow parents to be more involved in their children’s education and ensure that classroom materials are appropriate for their age.

But in heated debates at school board meetings and state houses across the country, the argument they have repeatedly made is that they try to prevent “nurturing” children – the same common term to describe how sex offenders initiate contact with their victims. .

The use of such rhetoric, argue opponents of the new laws, underscores a nationwide push for conservatives to make education a political wedge issue By comparing certain teaching materials and educators to pornography and even pedophilia. This latest trend is another volley in the country’s ongoing cultural wars, during which even conservative lawmakers have opposed the teaching of “critical race theory” And bills that require schools to publish all course materials online So parents can check them out.

Florida Gov. Ron Desentis, Republican Immigrant and Potential 2024 Presidential Candidate, Stood at the forefront of traffic. On Monday, Desentis signed a bill banning instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity In kindergarten to third grade. Meanwhile, he resented “liberal politicians” and activists who fought against the law, saying: “They support the sexuality of children in kindergarten.”

“They support the introduction of a vibrant gender ideology into second grades,” he added. “They support allowing schools to ‘transfer students’ to ‘another gender’ without the parent’s knowledge … without the parent’s consent.”

Desentis never said the word “groom,” but his press secretary, Christina Poshaw, noted on Twitter that legislation dubbed by opponents as a “do not say gay” law would be more accurately described as an “anti-grooming law.”

The use of the term is an attempt to distort the goal of teachers “who intend to express their acceptance to LGBT people, or perhaps share their stories … so that all students can know they have representation in the school,” they said. Casey Pick, senior fellow in public relations and government In the Trevor project, an association that provides support services for LGBT youth. When asked why she used it, Fushou replied in an email to the AP news agency, “I never stated that all writers are LGBTs, all LGBTs are narrators, or anything of the sort.” She did not elaborate.

In Tennessee, country music singer John Rich testified to lawmakers that school librarians who defend controversial books about gender identity and present LGBT characters “nurture” children to become insensitive to sexual abuse and pornography.

“What’s the difference between a teacher, a librarian who puts one of these books on a student’s desk, or a guy in a white van who stops when school drops out and says, ‘Walk around kids, let me read you this book?’ Rich asked last month. “What is the difference between these two scenarios? There is a difference. They can escape from the van.”

Oklahoma’s School Support Blog, Choice Remarks, shared an article on his Facebook page claiming that public schools are having sexual children. “The grooms are going to the groom,” the group stated in comments accompanying the article. “The solution is an educational choice.”

When the New York State Department of Education tweeted a book recommendation on Maya Cobba’s graphic novel “Gender Queer: A Moir,” the agency was attacked online for providing “pornographic” material to children, as well as “nurturing” and “predating” them. The agency later mimicked the tweet.

DeSantis and other conservative politicians and parents who have criticized the use of schools in schools with explicit sexual material argue that parents, not teachers, should come up with such issues with their children.

The main point of Florida law is that it “empowers parents to be involved in their children’s lives,” said Republican Rep. Joe Harding, who sponsored the legislation. At the signing ceremony on Monday, signs pasted on the rostrum and signs holding young children included the slogan “Protect children / support parents.”

But Catherine Oakley, the state legislature and senior adviser to Human Rights Campaign, a Washington-based LGBT advocacy group, said conservative groups are taking advantage of the fear of unknown materials, books and discussions taking place within classrooms to drive action. About teachers, librarians and other educators.

These groups “really come from this idea that sexual orientation (and gender identity) is something that is forced on children,” Oakley said. “It comes from a really fundamentally wrong position as to where a person’s home-grown identity comes from.”

The current trend to restrict the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity resonates with similar campaigns of the 1970s, in which far-right religious groups characterized people who identified as LGBTQ as trying to “convert children,” said Sophie Bjork-James, an assistant professor at Vanderbilt University. Investigating the U.S.-based religious right and the white nationalist movement. The indictment helped stop the extension of civil rights to sexual minorities, York-James said.

Britney McBride, deputy director of sex education at Advocates for Youth, an organization that promotes adolescent health and sexual rights, sees a concerted effort to create discomfort in school districts across the country, resulting in restricting the education students can receive. .

“It seems that adult discomfort has always taken precedence over rights and responsibilities as a society to provide our young people with the information they deserve,” McBride said.

Leave a Comment